Policy Innovation in State Government
Iowa State University Press, 1994 - 169 pages
Although it sometimes seems that governmental policies rarely change, American state governments do adopt innovations. This study considers why the states try new approaches to policy problems. It analyzes innovations from campaign financing and sunset laws to public transportation and regulating sexual behavior, seeking to determine what forces produce policy changes. Policy Innovation in State Government, the result of studies considering individual innovations, is an effort to make sense of a striking finding: State characteristics that largely accounted for some changes were of no value in accounting for others. Nice proposes a general theory based on a state's problem environment, resources, and orientation to government power.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
A Model of Policy Innovation
Teacher Competency Testing
9 other sections not shown
adopted competency testing agencies Amtrak subsidy balanced budget amendment balanced budget requirements Bibliography for full campaign finance candidates Canonical correlation Conrail conservatism conservative costs coverage decision makers deficits Democratic party Discriminant analysis economic Edwards and Sharkansky efforts election electorates emphasis enact encourage factors federal funds gamma governmental groups inclinations income individual influence issue legislature less liberal liberal Republican parties limited major McGregor multivariate analysis NOTES See Bibliography officials orientations Overall oversight particularly party ideology passenger Percent performance policy changes policy innovations policy-making population problem environment property tax relief proposals public finance public ownership rail service railroads reform regarding regression analysis relatively relief programs response result revenue role Sharkansky 1978 significant slack resources sodomy laws spending state-financed relief state's subsidize Amtrak substantial sunset laws sunset legislation Table teacher competency testing tend tion tism tively U.S. Supreme Court urban variety voting Walker wealthier