...public convenience, interest, or necessity require, does not confer an unlimited power, but is to be interpreted by its context, by the nature of radio...the public through the distribution of facilities. Yankee Network v. Federal Communications Commission, 1939, 107 F.2d 212, 71 App.DC 11. The policy of...

...objectionable as conferring indefinite and unlimited power, but is denned by the context and subject matter, and, where an equitable adjustment between States...the public through the distribution of facilities. P. 285! 16. In making " fair and equitable allocation," the equities of existing stations must be considered;...

...objectionable as conferring indefinite and unlimited power, but is denned by the context and subject matter, and, where an equitable adjustment between States...the public through the distribution of facilities. P. 285. 16. In making " fair and equitable allocation," the equities of existing stations must be considered;...

...setting up a standard so indefinite as to confer an unlimited power. * * * The requirement is to be interpreted by its context, by the nature of radio...by the scope, character, and quality of services. * * *" Part of the context is section 1 of the Communications Act, which states that the Commission...

..."public interest, convenience, or necessity." The standard of public interest is given significance "by its context, by the nature of radio transmission...the scope, character, and quality of services," and by the general objectives of the statute.1 As thus construed by the Supreme Court, the term "public...

...Central Securities Co. v. United States (287 US 12, 24). The requirement is to be interpreted by Us context, by the nature of radio transmission and reception,...service which will be enjoyed by the public through (he distribution of facilitiesIn making such an adjustment the equities of existing stations undoubtedly...

...criterion of "public convenience, interest, or necessity" is not an indefinite standard, but one to be "interpreted by its context, by the nature of radio...scope, character, and quality of services, * * *" And he cites Federal Radio Common v. Nelson Bros. Co. [Continuing reading:] Nothing in the context of which...

...criterion of "public convenience, Interest or necessity" is not an indefinite standard, but one to be "interpreted by its context, by the nature of radio...reception, by the scope, character and quality of services, . . ." Federal Radio Voimn'n v. A'c/sow Bros. Co., 2i9 US 2(iO, ish. Nothing in the context of which...

...power. Compare New York Central Securities Co. v. United States, 287 US 12, 24. The requirement is to be interpreted by its context, by the nature of radio...reception, by the scope, character and quality of services . . ." Federal Radio Comm'n v. Nelson Bros. Co., 289 US 266, 285. The "public interest" to be served...

...power. Compare New York Central Securities Co. v. United States, 287 US 12, 24. The requirement is to be interpreted by its context, by the nature of radio...reception, by the scope, character and quality of services . . ." Federal Radio Comm'n v. Nelson Bros. Co., 289 US 266, 285. The "public interest" to be served...