| United States. Department of Justice. Antitrust Division - 1977 - 80 pages
...to a charge of monopolization under Section 2 of the Sherman Act. The Supreme Court has stated that "The offense of monopoly under §2 of the Sherman Act has two elements: (1) the possession of monopoly power in the relevant market and (2) the willful acquisition or maintenance... | |
| U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission - 1975 - 1118 pages
...or exclude competition."1 5 In United States v. Grinnell Corp. the court restated this definition: The offense of monopoly under §2 of the Sherman Act has two elements: (1) the possession of monopoly power in the relevant market and (2) the willful acquisition or maintenance... | |
| Wilbur L. Fugate, Lee H. Simowitz - 1997 - 1320 pages
...specific intent is necessary.29 In the Grinnell case, the Supreme Court laid down the test as follows: The offense of monopoly under §2 of the Sherman Act has two elements: (1) the possession of monopoly power in the relevant market and (2) the willful acquisition or maintenance... | |
| Mark A. Glick, Lara A. Reymann, Richard Hoffman - 2002 - 504 pages
...v. Grinnell Corp.,203 the Supreme Court expressed the elements of a monopolization case as follows: The offense of monopoly under § 2 of the Sherman Act has two elements: (1) the possession of monopoly power in the relevant market and (2) the willful acquisition or maintenance... | |
| Curtis M. Grimm, Hun Lee, Ken G. Smith - 2005 - 288 pages
...classic statement of this point comes from the 1966 Grinnell case: The offense of monopoly under section 2 of the Sherman Act has two elements: (i) the possession of monopoly power in the relevant market Managers should be aware that hard, honest competition per se will not be judged illegal; in practice,... | |
| |