Transition, Cohesion and Regional Policy in Central and Eastern EuropeJohn Bachtler, Ruth Downes, Grzegorz Gorzelak Ashgate, 2000 - 378 pages The origins of this volume lie in the history of collaboration on regional development research between the editors and many of the authors over a period of ten years. Through a series of international research projects, conferences and seminars debating the emerging regional development challenges and regional policy responses in Central and Eastern Europe, the idea of a book that would take a comprehensive, systematic look at the issues was born. After a decade of reform, the book was conceived as an opportunity to take stock of the regional problems and disparities associated with the transition process and regional development policy challenges confronting regional, national and European policy-makers. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 16
Page 87
... NUTS II regions . In the other cases , the NUTS II regions comprise a number of the new regions as shown in Table 6.2 . Table 6.1 NUTS designation in the Czech Republic NUTS II Prague Mid - Bohemia South - West North - West North - East ...
... NUTS II regions . In the other cases , the NUTS II regions comprise a number of the new regions as shown in Table 6.2 . Table 6.1 NUTS designation in the Czech Republic NUTS II Prague Mid - Bohemia South - West North - West North - East ...
Page 179
... NUTS III regions and NUTS II when aggregated into four groups . The Slovak Republic as a whole is considered a NUTS I region and , at lower levels , the 79 districts are NUTS IV and the 2,875 settlements or administrative communes are ...
... NUTS III regions and NUTS II when aggregated into four groups . The Slovak Republic as a whole is considered a NUTS I region and , at lower levels , the 79 districts are NUTS IV and the 2,875 settlements or administrative communes are ...
Page 312
... NUTS II regions and instead were accepted as regions corresponding to the NUTS III level . However , for the Czech Republic , the NUTS II regions are the most important level given their centrality in the eligibility for Objective 1 ...
... NUTS II regions and instead were accepted as regions corresponding to the NUTS III level . However , for the Czech Republic , the NUTS II regions are the most important level given their centrality in the eligibility for Objective 1 ...
Contents
Challenges of Transition for Regional Development | 1 |
Transformation and the Interdependencies between Political | 33 |
NATIONAL REVIEWS | 69 |
Copyright | |
13 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Transition, Cohesion and Regional Policy in Central and Eastern Europe Ruth Downes Limited preview - 2019 |
Transition, Cohesion and Regional Policy in Central and Eastern Europe Ruth Downes,John Bachtler No preview available - 2021 |
Common terms and phrases
activities agriculture areas average border Bratislava Budapest budget Bulgaria capital CEE countries Central and Eastern centres co-ordination cohesion companies considerable created creation cross-border co-operation Czech Republic decentralisation demographic developed regions districts Eastern Europe economic development enterprises environment environmental Estonia European Union Euroregions factors framework growth Györ Harjumaa Hungarian Hungary impact implementation important increased indicators industrial infrastructure inhabitants initial institutional Interreg issues km² labour Latgale Latvia liberalisation Lithuania market economy Ministry municipalities NUTS NUTS II organisation overall particular patterns percent Phare planning Poland Polish political pollution population potential Prague privatisation problems production programmes reform regional development policy regional disparities regional level regional policy relatively restructuring result role Romania rural self-government Slovak Republic Slovakia Slovenia SMEs social socialist socio-economic spatial Statistical strategies Structural Funds sub-national Table Territorial administrative structure trade transformation transition economies trends urban voivodships Warsaw