| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1920 - 808 pages
...his whereabouts on the day in question he made contradictory and false statements. We are impressed that there was sufficient evidence to take the case to the jury. Whether it established defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt was for the jury. The charge was... | |
| Wisconsin. Supreme Court, Abram Daniel Smith, Philip Loring Spooner, Obadiah Milton Conover, Frederic King Conover, Frederick William Arthur, Frederick C. Seibold - 1885 - 772 pages
...long after Kay built the fence, and, in this respect, the case was like Ilass v. Plautz, 56 Wis. 105. There was sufficient evidence to take the case to the jury on the question as to the location of the true line. Having found in favor of the line claimed by the defendants as... | |
| 1914 - 1418 pages
...question that the evidence did not support the verdict, and that the verdict was excessive, we think there was sufficient evidence to take the case to the jury on the subject of the loss of profits that Graham could have made if the contract had not been broken, and... | |
| 1922 - 1218 pages
...meaning of that term as construed in the authorities cited. We must therefore hold that there was not sufficient evidence to take the case to the jury on the question of nnsoundness of mind. On another trial, If the evidence be substantially the same as that given on... | |
| 1905 - 1266 pages
...own behalf. We are of opinion that this verdict should be reversed as against the weight of evidence. There was sufficient evidence to take the case to the jury on the question of the plaintiff's contributory negligence and the negligence of the chauffeur, but it does not preponderate... | |
| New York (State). Supreme Court. Appellate Division - 1901 - 780 pages
...opinion, clearly shows that the members of the court who concurred in the prevailing opinion considered that there was sufficient evidence to take the case to the jury. There was no serious conflict in the testimony, so far as the evidence was printed in this record ;... | |
| |