Page images
PDF
EPUB

*

were oppressed by the strength and number of their ancient auxiliaries; the century after the deaths of Petrarch and Boccace was filled with a crowd of Latin imitators, who decently repose on our shelves; but in that era of learning it will not be easy to discern a real discovery of science, a work of invention or eloquence, in the popular language of the country. But as soon as it had been deeply saturated with the celestial dew, the soil was quickened into vegetation and life; the modern idioms were refined; the classics of Athens and Rome inspired a pure taste and a generous emulation; and in Italy, as afterwards in France and England, the pleasing reign of poetry and fiction was succeeded by the light of speculative and experimental philosophy. Genius may anticipate the season of maturity; but in the education of a people, as in that of an individual, memory must be exercised, before the powers of reason and fancy can be expanded; nor may the artist hope to equal or surpass, till he has learned to imitate, the works of his predecessors.

CHAPTER LXVII.-SCHISM OF THE GREEKS AND LATINS.--REIGN AND CHARACTER OF AMURATH THE SECOND.-CRUSADE OF LADISLAUS, KING OF HUNGARY.-HIS DEFEAT AND DEATH.-JOHN HUNIADES. SCANDERBEG.-CONSTANTINE PALEOLOGUS, LAST EMPEROR OF THE EAST.

THE respective merits of Rome and Constantinople are compared and celebrated by an eloquent Greek; the father of the Italian schools. The view of the ancient capital, ponius Lætus, have been shown in a note to ch. 30, vol. iii. p. 390. The example of Nicholas V. only taught his successors to avoid his dangerous course. Wherever they could, they endeavoured to prevent the diffusion of knowledge; and where they patronized, it was to encourage such literary compositions as amused or bewildered without instructing. See vol. iv. p. 318, for Vida's Poem on Silkworms, said to be the best work of the best poet, in days called "golden," because "a Guido painted and a Vida sang." Leo X. made him a prior, and Clement VII. a bishop.-ED.]

*The survivor of Boccace died in the year 1375; and we cannot place before 1480 the composition of the Morgante Maggiore of Pulci, and the Orlando Inamorato of Boyardo. (Tiraboschi, tom. vi. p. 2, p. 174—177.)

The epistle of Emanuel Chrysoloras to the emperor John Palæologus will not offend the eye or ear of a classical student (ad calcem

the seat of his ancestors, surpassed the most sanguine expectations of Emanuel Chrysoloras; and he no longer blamed the exclamation of an old sophist, that Rome was the habitation, not of men, but of gods. Those gods, and those men, had long since vanished; but, to the eye of liberal enthusiasm, the majesty of ruin restored the image of her ancient prosperity. The monuments of the consuls and Cæsars, of the martyrs and apostles, engaged on all sides the curiosity of the philosopher and the Christian; and he confessed, that in every age the arms and the religion of Rome were destined to reign over the earth. While Chrysoloras admired the venerable beauties of the mother, he was not forgetful of his native country, her fairest daughter, her imperial colony; and the Byzantine patriot expatiates with zeal and truth on the eternal advantages of nature, and the more transitory glories of art and dominion, which adorned, or had adorned, the city of Constantine. Yet the perfection of the copy still redounds (as he modestly observes) to the honour of the original, and parents are delighted to be renewed, and even excelled, by the superior merit of their children. "Constantinople,' says the orator, "is situate on a commanding point, between Europe and Asia, between the Archipelago and the Euxine. By her interposition, the two seas, and the two continents, are united for the common benefit of nations; and the gates of commerce may be shut or opened at her command. The harbour, encompassed on all sides by the sea and the continent, is the most secure and capacious in the world. The walls and gates of Constantinople may be compared with those of Babylon; the towers are many; each tower is a solid and lofty structure; and the second wall, the outer fortification, would be suffi cient for the defence and dignity of an ordinary capital. A broad and rapid stream may be introduced into the ditches; and the artificial island may be encompassed like Athens Codini de Antiquitatibus C. P. p. 107-126). The superscription suggests a chronological remark, that John Palæologus II. was associated in the empire before the year 1414, the date of Chrysoloras's death. A still earlier date, at least 1408, is deduced from the age of his youngest sons, Demetrius and Thomas, who were both Porphyrogeniti. (Ducange, Fam. Byzant. p. 244. 247.)

[ocr errors]

* Somebody observed, that the city of Athens might be circumnavigated (τις ἔιπεν τὴν πόλιν τῶν Αθηναίων δύνασθαι καὶ παρα πλεῖν καὶ περιπλεῖν). But what may be true in a rhetorical sense of

by land or water." Two strong and natural causes are
alleged for the perfection of the model of new Rome. The
royal founder reigned over the most illustrious nations of
the globe; and in the accomplishment of his designs the
power of the Romans was combined with the art and science
of the Greeks. Other cities have been reared to maturity
by accident and time; their beauties are mingled with dis-
order and deformity; and the inhabitants, unwilling to
remove from their natal spot, are incapable of correcting the
errors of their ancestors, and the original vices of situation
or climate. But the free idea of Constantinople was formed
and executed by a single mind; and the primitive model
was improved by the obedient zeal of the subjects and suc-
cessors of the first monarch. The adjacent isles were stored
with an inexhaustible supply of marble; but the various
materials were transported from the most remote shores of
Europe and Asia; and the public and private buildings, the
palaces, churches, aqueducts, cisterns, porticoes, columns,
baths, and hippodromes, were adapted to the greatness of
the capital of the East. The superfluity of wealth was spread
along the shores of Europe and Asia; and the Byzantine
territory, as far as the Euxine, the Hellespont, and the long
wall, might be considered as a populous suburb and a per-
petual garden. In this flattering picture, the past and the
present, the times of prosperity and decay, are artfully con-
founded; but a sigh and a confession escape from the orator,
that his wretched country was the shadow and sepulchre of
its former self. The works of ancient sculpture had been
defaced by Christian zeal or Barbaric violence; the fairest
structures were demolished, and the marbles of Paros or
Numidia were burnt for lime, or applied to the meanest
uses. Of many a statue, the place was marked by an empty
pedestal; of many a column, the size was determined by a
broken capital; the tombs of the emperors were scattered
on the ground; the stroke of time was accelerated by
storms and earthquakes; and the vacant space was adorned,
by vulgar tradition, with fabulous monuments of gold and
silver. From these wonders, which lived only in memory
or belief, he distinguishes, however, the porphyry pillar, the
Constantinople, cannot be applied to the situation of Athens, five
miles from the sea, and not intersected or surrounded by any navi.
gable streams.

[ocr errors][merged small]

column and colossus of Justinian,* and the church, more especially the dome of St. Sophia; the best conclusion, since it could not be described according to its merits, and after it no other object could deserve to be mentioned. But he forgets, that a century before, the trembling fabrics of the colossus and the church had been saved and supported by the timely care of Andronicus the elder. Thirty years after the emperor had fortified St. Sophia with two new buttresses or pyramids, the eastern hemisphere suddenly gave way; and the images, the altars, and the sanctuary, were crushed by the falling ruin. The mischief indeed was speedily repaired; the rubbish was cleared by the incessant labour of every rank and age; and the poor remains of riches and industry were consecrated by the Greeks to the most stately and venerable temple of the East.t

The last hope of the falling city and empire was placed in the harmony of the mother and daughter, in the maternal tenderness of Rome, and the filial obedience of Constantinople. In the synod of Florence, the Greeks and Latins had embraced, and subscribed, and promised; but these signs of friendship were perfidious or fruitless; and the

*Nicephorus Gregoras has described the colossus of Justinian (1. 7. 12): but his measures are false and inconsistent. The editor Boivin consulted his friend Girardon; and the sculptor gave him the true porportions of an equestrian statue. That of Justinian was still visible to Peter Gyllius, not on the column, but in the outward court of the seraglio; and he was at Constantinople when it was melted down, and cast into a brass cannon (de Topograph. C. P. 1. 2, c. 17). [Bertrandon de la Brocquière has left us a picture of Constantinople and its decaying grandeur, as seen by him twenty-one years before the city was taken by the Turks. The equestrian statue of Justinian (erroneously called by him Constantine) still occupied its position on the summit of its figured column. But he speaks strangely of having seen there the celebrated bronze horses which had been conveyed to Venice two hundred and twenty-eight years before his visit. He probably means only the pillars on which they once stood. See Early Travels in Palestine, Bohn. p. 334-342.-ED.]

See the decay and repairs of St. Sophia, in Nicephorus Gregoras (1. 7. 12; 1. 15. 2). The building was propped by Andronicus in 1317; the eastern hemisphere fell in 1345. The Greeks, in their pompous rhetoric, exalt the beauty and holiness of the church, an earthly heaven, the abode of angels, and of God himself, &c.

The genuine and original narrative of Syropulus (p. 312-351), opens the schism from the first office of the Greeks at Venice, to the general opposition at Constantinople of the clergy and people.

baseless fabric of the union vanished like a dream.* The emperor and his prelates returned home in the Venetian galleys; but as they touched at the Morea and the isles of Corfu and Lesbos, the subjects of the Latins complained that the pretended union would be an instrument of oppression. No sooner did they land on the Byzantine shore, than they were saluted, or rather assailed, with a general murmur of zeal and discontent. During their absence, above two years, the capital had been deprived of its civil and ecclesiastical rulers; fanaticism fermented in anarchy; the most furious monks reigned over the conscience of women and bigots; and the hatred of the Latin name was the first principle of nature and religion. Before his departure for Italy, the emperor had flattered the city with the assurance of a prompt relief and a powerful succour; and the clergy, confident in their orthodoxy and science, had promised themselves and their flocks an easy victory over the blind shepherds of the West. The double disappointment exasperated the Greeks; the conscience of the subscribing prelates was awakened; the hour of temptation was past; and they had more to dread from the public resentment, than they could hope from the favour of the emperor or the pope. Instead of justifying their conduct, they deplored their weakness, professed their contrition, and cast themselves on the mercy of God and of their brethren. To the reproachful question, what had been the event or use of their Italian synod? they answered, with sighs and tears, "Alas! we have made a new faith; we have exchanged piety for impiety; we have betrayed the immaculate sacrifice; and we are become Azymites.' (The Azymites were those who celebrated the communion with unleavened bread; and I must retract or qualify the praise which I have bestowed on the growing philosophy of the times.) Alas! we have been seduced by distress, by fraud, and by the hopes and fears of a transitory life. The hand that has signed the union should be cut off; and the tongue that has

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

*On the schism of Constantinople, see Phranza (1. 2, c. 17), Laonicus Chalcocondylas (1. 6, p. 155, 156), and Ducas (c. 31); the last of whom writes with truth and freedom. Among the moderns we may distin guish the continuator of Fleury (tom. xxii. p. 338, &c. 401. 420, &c.) and Spondanus (A.D. 1440-50). The sense of the latter is drowned in prejudice and passion, as soon as Rome and religion are concerned.

« PreviousContinue »