As to reasonable doubt. -Good, 250-338; 233-198; 150-181; 147-444; 145-357; 151-523; 143-571; 142-620; 117-422; 117-271; 110-42; 100-242; 98-261; 272-558 (570); 288-281. -Not bad, 194-506. -Properly refused, 248-64; 233-198. -When not required, 120-317. -Held bad, 279-139 (147); 279-435 (442); 277-621. -Omitting element of reasonable doubt-bad, 157-382; 91 142. -Must cover all points, 137-602; 269-300. -When proper, 134-438; 124-576. Repeating. -Instructions need not be repeated on both sides, 150-181; 150-66; 148-173; 121-497; 120-317; 93-394; 148-494; 147-444; 138-356; 137-538; 137-602; 261-517. Assuming facts in. -When cured, 160-480. -When, 158-382; 196-173; 259-213. -Must not assume that facts have been proved, 141-195; 141-270; 133-382; 105-409; 271-138; 286-593. -When not assuming fact, 231-261; 103-82; 100-242; 282-51 (62); 286-496. -May assume fact not denied, 114-86. -Must not assume guilt, 65-17; 34-516; 284-429. Accused as witness, etc. -On credibility of accused as a witness, 250-338; 251-67; 146-660; 210-196; 147-394; 140-46; 114-505; 110-11; 259-88; 261517; 286-593; 288-371 (380). -As to value of accused's testimony in own behalf-good, 204-208; 143-571; 255-516. -As to accused failing to testify-proper for accused, 133244; 105-452; 264-243. As to conduct of accused, 234-68; 161-309; 258-430. Based on evidence. -Instructions must be based on evidence in the case, 148440; 141-270; 141-75; 137-325; 124-218; 117-422; 134-380; 271138 (143); 286-142. -Must be on questions involved in the case, 131-22. As to possession of stolen goods. That possession of stolen goods is evidence of guilt, 237541; 266-216. -Receiving stolen property-as to possession of goods, 229376; 35-204. -When bad, 204-233. -Not bad, 196-173. -As to knowledge of stolen goods received, bad, 197-482. Miscellaneous instructions. -As to intoxication-when proper, 227-80; 263-564. -As to what evidence will convict, 68-271. -As to malice, 215-369; 268-607. 142. Permitting jury to fix sentence-manslaughter-bad, 213 -As to expert testimony-held bad, 141-195. -As to accomplice as witness against accused, 140-588. -Not in bill of exceptions, 254-167. On what indictment covers, held good, 261-517; 288-371 (382). -Receiving stolen property, 286-114 (118). -Directing jury to acquit, improper, 288-268. -As to impeachment of witness, 132-504; 251-381. -As to form of verdict is bad, 142-117. -Should not be argumentative, 131-22; 261-339; 288-371 (381); 288-310 (316). -Permitting each juror "to decide for himself"-bad, 157 153. -Requiring jury to be "satisfied" of defense-bad, 134-438; 171-473. -Should be given to the jury without marks showing for whom given, 134-401. -That Court does not express its opinion by the instructions-held bad, 137-602. -All the law of the case need not be given in each, 148-467. -As to proof required-held bad, 146-660. -May be given though law books are read to jury, 148-296. "Finding from the evidence" in instructions-rule as to, 146-660. -Raising objection to in upper court, 280-11. --Reading only part of to jury, 284-620. -Not bad because poorly drawn, 284-273. -Restricting certain evidence to specific purpose-good, 145-357. -Good one case, bad one-how far-rule, 141-195. -Where the evidence is conflicting jury should be instructed, 104-569. -As to weight of evidence-held good, 117-422. -As to attorney's remarks-when not, 124-218. -Stating that all defendants are liable for the acts of any of them-held proper, 239-168. -When not reversible though admitting an element, 240633. -Referring to defense as "claimed"-bad, 234-68. -Harmless error in, will not reverse, 204-170. -That conviction may be had despite good character of accused is proper, 239-168. -As to procuring dynamite with intent to kill-held good, 134-139. -Instructions in language of statute, 250-338, -Mere surplus of, is not reversible, 250-338. -Reciting all essential facts and directing verdict on, is good, 200-494. -Not reversible if point covered by others, 198-162. -Are to be considered together as one charge, 198-162. -Refusal proper if point covered by others, 194-506. -Calling attention to conduct of accused at trial, 161-309 258-430. -Once disapproved should not be given, 266-70. -Authorizing acquittal of one of several defendants held proper, 255-516. -As to value of detective" evidence, 258-468. That evidence must "generate full belief in guilt"-bad, 213-114. -Cautioning jury as to accused's admissions, 204-208. -Elements necessary to prove guilt, 231-193,, -Complicated-not liked, 226-388. -Confusing, or useless; may be refused, 213-142. -Not based on evidence-when reversible, 210-410. -Must be accurate on close facts, 210-196; 199-173; 179-633. -Reference to indictment in, is proper, 206-337. -Should not call attention to particular witness, 104-504. -As to dying declarations-held bad, 113-372. -As to dying declaration-good as modified, 113-372. INSURANCE. (Hurd Ch. 73.) Must Place Insurance Through Legally Authorized Agents Resident in This State. 1. That it shall be unlawful for any insurance company legally authorized to transact insurance business in the State of Illinois to write, place or cause to be written or placed any policy or contract for indemnity for insurance upon property situated or located in the State of Illinois, except through legally authorized agents in the State of Illinois, and the writing, placing or causing to be placed any such policy of insurance is hereby declared to be a violation of the law providing for the payment of taxes by foreign insurance companies doing business in the State of Illinois, as provided in section 30 of an act entitled, "An act to incorporate and govern fire, marine and inland navigation insurance companies doing business in the State of Illinois," approved and in force March 11, 1869. 2. Any company violating the provisions of the first section of this act upon notice and satisfactory proof thereof being made to the Auditor of Public Accounts of the State of Illinois, shall have its authority to transact business in the State of Illinois revoked by the Auditor of Public Accounts for a period of not less than ninety days, and any insurance company whose license to do business in Illinois is so revoked by said Auditor, shall not be again permitted to do business in Illinois until all taxes and penalties due thereon shall have been paid, together with any expenses that may be due [under] the provisions of this act to the Auditor of Public Accounts of the State of Illinois, and such company shall only be re-authorized to transact business in the State of Illinois upon a complete compliance with the laws of this State governing fire, marine and inland insurance companies. 3. When notice of any violation of the first section of this act is received by the Auditor of Public Accounts of the State of Illinois, that it shall forthwith be his duty in person or by deputy, to visit the office of such company where such contract of insurance has been written or made, and demand an inspection of the books and records of such company. Any company refusing to exhibit its books and records for his inspection shall be deemed guilty of violating the provisions of the first section of this act, and the penalties provided in this act shall immediately be enforced against such company by the Auditor of Public Accounts. 4. The Auditor of Public Accounts shall receive as a compensation for the services rendered under the provisions of this act his necessary traveling expenses, and all reasonable expenses incurred, which sum shall be charged against the company so visited by him and collected from such company. § 13. Any company, corporation, association, society or other insurer or any officer or agent thereof, which or who issues or delivers to any person in this State any policy in willful violation of the provisions of this Act shall be punished by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars for each offense, and the Insurance Superintendent may revoke the license of any company, corporation, association, society or other insurer of another state or country, or of the agent thereof, which or who willfully violates any prvision of this Act. (Act of 1915.) 24. Every penalty provided for by this act shall be sued for and recovered in the name of the people, by the state's attorney of the county in which the company or the agent or agents so violating shall be situated, and one-half of said penalty, when recovered, shall be paid into the treasury of said. county, and the other half to the informer of such violation; and in the case of the non-payment of such penalty, the party so offending shall be liable to imprisonment for a period not exceeding six months, in the discretion of any court having cognizance thereof. Such penalties may also be sued for and recovered in the name of the people, by the attorney general, and when sued for and collected by him shall be paid into the state treasury. -Penalty for violation, 253-399. Making Return-Statement. (Hurd Ch. 73 § 189.) 9. Any company doing business in this state neglecting to make returns, in the manner and within the time hereinbefore authorized and prescribed, shall forfeit $100 for each day's neglect; and every company that willfully makes false statements shall be liable to a fine of not less than $500 nor more than $1,000. Any new business done by any company or its |