What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action admitted agent alleged allowed amount answer appear apply assignment authority bank bill bonds bound brought called cause charge charter Circuit Court claim collision Congress consideration Constitution construction contract corporation counsel course decided decision decree deed defendants delivered direct district dollars duty effect equity et al evidence exception execution facts filed freight give given Government grant ground hundred interest issued John judge judgment jurisdiction jury Justice land libel light lots master necessary notes notice objection officer opinion owners paid parties passed patent payment persons plaintiff possession premium present principle proceedings proof proper proved purchase question Railroad reason received record referred reported respect river rule ship steamer suit taken term tion United vessel witnesses writ of error York
Page 485 - that the laws of the several States, except where the Constitution, treaties, or statutes of the United States shall otherwise require or provide, shall be regarded as rules of decision in trials at common law in the courts of the United States, in cases where they apply.
Page 26 - The liability of the owner of any vessel for any embezzlement, loss or destruction by any person of any property, goods or merchandise, shipped or put on board of such vessel, or for any loss, damage or injury by collision, or for any act, matter or thing, loss, damage or forfeiture, done, occasioned or incurred, without the privity or knowledge of such owner or owners, shall in no case exceed the amount or value of the interest of such owner in such vessel and her freight then pending.
Page 358 - Bench that *the rule of law is clear, "that, where one, by his words or conduct, wilfully causes another to believe the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief so as to alter his own previous position; the former is concluded from averring against the latter a different state of things as existing at the same time.
Page viii - ... it shall be the duty of the plaintiff in error, or appellant, as the case may be, to docket the cause, and file the record thereof, with the clerk of this Court, within the first six days of the term...
Page vii - ... appeal, such presiding judge may make such rule or order for the safe-keeping, transporting, and return of such original papers as to him may seem proper ; and this court will receive and consider such original papers in connection with the transcript of the proceedings.
Page 419 - Where it is a simple question of authority to contract, arising either on a question of regularity of organization or of power conferred by the charter, a party who has had the benefit of the agreement cannot be permitted in an action founded upon it to question its validity. It would be in the highest degree inequitable and unjust to permit a defendant to repudiate a contract, the benefit of which he retains.
Page 112 - I think that the judgment of the Circuit Court should be reversed, and the case remanded for a new trial. THE COVINOTON DRAWBRIDOE COMPANY AND RICHARD M.
Page 323 - That every person or corporation who has, or shall have, purchased or constructed any newly invented machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, prior to the application by the inventor or discoverer for a patent, shall be held to possess the right to use, and vend to others to be used, the specific machine, manufacture, or composition of matter so made or purchased, without liability therefor to the inventor, or any other person interested in such invention...