A Practical Treatise on the Law of Replevin: As Administered by the Courts of the United States, Arranged in Three Parts to Facilitate Ready Reference

Front Cover
J.E. Cobbey, 1890 - 933 pages
 

Contents

Where the tenancy is for a definite time replevin will not lie until
31
469
33
DistressHistory
37
Money paid a security company to furnish bonds cannot be allowed
42
To authorize a distress must be an actual demise
43
ant 230
44
xlix
45
Venire how laid in a replevin of a distress
49
CHAPTER VI
50
232
51
The sameNegative illustrations
55
WHO MAY MAINTAIN REPLEVIN
67
An officer may replevy from another officer or from a receiptor
68
471
83
CHAPTER VIII
85
As against a wrongdoer prior possession alone sufficient
90
Part payment no defense to replevin by mortgagee 183
91
Right to the possession indispensable to maintain the action
94
Where no default has been made 198
97
An equitable title alone will not support replevin
100
Bailee may replevy from a stranger to the title 210
103
Possession parted with conditionallyBailor
106
Effect of sale by one partner of his interest 226
108
Where title is reserved by seller his interest is sufficient to support
112
Statute of fraudsTitle based on insufficient
118
244
121
Title based on an unexecuted or conditional contract
124
Where it is impossible to restore will not be required
129
To the right of property plaintiff must add the right of possession
130
Either a general or special property is sufficient
133
Failure of vendee may justify a rescission
135
One of several defendants in an execution
139
Does not lie by vendee to enforce contract of sale
141
Need not allege his official character in petition 292
142
One who has lost possession wrongfully
145
A stranger to the writ of seizure may replevy 301
149
An administrator may replevy personal property of his intestate
151
Where property is wrongfully taken from a lienholder he may
157
A finder of property has a lien on it for the reward offered
163
May be brought where property is or where defendant resides 327
164
Illegality of the tax no ground for replevin 336
170
after he has had possession
189
The same Proper judgment in such a case
195
Rights of the holder of a colorable title merely 387
199
strangerDuty of bailee
211
It lies for goods obtained by the fraudulent use of the process of
215
285
216
A bailee of property cannot dispute the title of his bailor
217
A purchaser of stolen property cannot maintain replevin against
221
The sameBoth owners can join and replevy
223
286
225
Joint owners must join as plaintiffs 429
227
A tenant in common cannot replevy from an officer who has taken
229
Where by agreement one is to have exclusive possession replevin
235
Possession of goods by mistakeLien 469
238
475
239
When one joint owner may sever the property by his own act with
241
Where title reserved vendor may replevy from assignee
247
Title of record does not excuse 460
249
Use restricted to certain limits
253
287
262
CHAPTER XXII
277
Requisites of affidavit 583
278
Affidavit must allege the property was not taken for tax etc 534
285
The same
292
There is a distinction between a good cause of action defectively
299
A purchaser of property so taken is not protected from replevin 303
303
Total lack of affidavit cannot be cured by amendment
305
Attached property may be replevied
309
Lies for powder condemned by city officers
315
Rule in regard to replevin of attached property 624
317
Replevin lies against a receiver where he takes the wrong property
321
The writ is under the control of plaintiff 625
327
Replevin for property illegally seized may be brought in any court
337
Payment of tax after seizure no ground for replevin
343
The same Illustrations
349
CHAPTER XXV
351
circumstances
353
Statutory bond is indispensable 675
357
The general rule
359
Where the intention of the parties make a building personalty
365
The same
371
While the replevin suit is pending the property cannot be seized
374
Replevin does not lie by one of two claimants of government land
377
The same in case of trespasser
383
WHERE THE GOOODS HAVE BEEN CHANGED IN FORM OR ENHANCED IN VALUE
389
The plea or answer of defendant 739
391
Rule where property has been returned to defendant and plaintiff
448
Excessive damages must not be allowed for use 889
449
Damages not the subject of an independent action 847
453
Jury cannot give more than is claimed in the pleadings 861
461
Where successful party has become repossessed his damages
467
But a contrary rule has been laid down
473
The purpose for which property is used should be considered in esti
477
Proof of When made
479
In case of stocks is the value on day of trial 901
483
Acts and notice equivalent to demandIntervenor
485
Action by mortgagee vs mortgagor
491
General rule of damages where property has been changed in form 909
493
When demand of an officer proceeding under a writ of attachment
497
Expenses of taking and removing property 923
501
Fraud by vendeeAttaching or other creditorNo demand neces
503
Actual malice must be shown 928
507
Value should be assessed as of time of trial 938
519
Rule where produce is shipped to a distant market 946
526
Where the taking was with malice 956
532
Cannot recover for use or detention in addition to value 961
535
Prospective profits are too remote and are not an element of dam
541
CHAPTER XXXII
547
Declarations of plaintiff not admissible in his favor 986
553
Evidence admissible under non detinet 1004
563
As to matters accruing after a suit 1012
570
The same 1020
576
When no conflict court may direct verdict 1026
580
Possession evidence of title 1939
586
CHAPTER XXXIV
593
Where the successful party claims less than a full interest the value
613
Finding partly for defendant and partly for plaintiff proper when 1082
619
If there is a total lack of description the writ is void
621
The judgment must speak as to all the parties 1102
622
Judgment may be made to conform to verdict by motion 1089
625
Writ may be amended on trial as to value
627
The officer should serve the property first
633
Measure of damages where officer has lost the replevin bond
639
Nor if he has acquired possession during the litigation 1124
644
And trover will not lie against the officer
645
An officer may have judgment for a sum larger than the value
650
A replevin writ cannot be executed on Sunday
651
Substitution of defendants 1152
656
Secreting or driving property away is not contempt
657
BarEstoppelFormer replevin 1163
662
An officer is liable on his official bond for the judgment against
668
CHAPTER XXXVII
672
Court may require a statutory bond
677
CHAPTER XXXVIII
681
Bond need not be under seal
683
But if defendant claim further relief the plaintiff should be heard
687
If bond good when taken it is sufficient
689
The action should not be dismissed on slight grounds 1211
690
Objection how madeMust be before trial
695
Judgment in trial of the right of property has the same effect 1220
696
Giving redelivery bond waives what defenses
701
It may be brought against the plaintiff 1233
702
Joint parties should join in proceedings to vacate or modify
704
Defense cannot be changed upon appeal 1245
710
Title during suitRedelivery bondSecond replevin
715
Effect of sale made by party in possession
721
Insufficiency of description is waived by pleading
727
The nature of these pleas
733
The plea of cepit in año loco
741
But if defendant in replevin take advantage of such error to dis
742
PROPER PARTIES
744
The denials of the answer must be full and explicit
747
CHAPTER XLV
751
Evidence of matter in estoppel
753
Sure ties are bound by the judgment rendered in the replevin action 1314
757
Answer should allege amount levy and validity of writ
759
Where there are several defendants
765
Contribution and subrogation 1336
769
Illustrations of sufficient answers
771
In justice court the damages are not limited by the jurisdiction
775
Defendant cannot anticipate special title not pleaded by plaintif
777
CHAPTER XLVII
787
Recoupment and setoff not allowed in replevin
791
Defense cannot be changed after suit brought
797
Justification under a writ is a good defense
803
A party in his suit on the bond must occupy a position consistent
806
Where defendant pleads a former adjudication he must show all
811
So only matters arising out of the replevin suit can be urged
849
Where property is not taken the rule is ordinarily the value with
880
Interest not always a proper measure of damages
886
Loss from interruption of business and machinery lying idle 919
891
gross 1064
931
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 267 - The plaintiff, in an action to recover the possession of personal property, may at the time of issuing the summons, or at any time before answer, claim the immediate delivery of such property as provided in this chapter.
Page 482 - ... if the property has been delivered to the plaintiff, and the defendant claim a return thereof. judgment for the defendant may be for a return of the property or the value thereof, in case a return cannot be had, and damages for taking and withholding the same.
Page 474 - It is an elementary principle in the law of all civilized communities that no man can be deprived of his property except by his own voluntary act or by operation of law. The thief who steals a chattel, or the trespasser who takes it by force, acquires no title by such wrongful taking.
Page 353 - ... to the effect that the plaintiff shall duly prosecute the action and pay all costs and damages...
Page 650 - In all cases, therefore, where it is sought to apply the estoppel of a judgment rendered upon one cause of action to matters arising in a suit upon a different cause of action, the inquiry must always be as to the point or question actually litigated and determined in the original action, not what might have been thus litigated and determined. Only upon such matters is the judgment conclusive in another action.
Page 476 - The acknowledged principle of the civil law is that a willful wrongdoer acquires no property in the goods of another either by the wrongful taking, or by any change wrought in them by his labor or skill, however great that change may be.
Page 475 - There is great confusion in the books upon the question what constitutes change of identity. In one case, (5 Hen. 7, fol. 15,) it is said that the owner may reclaim the goods so long as they may be known, or in other words, ascertained by inspection. But this in many cases is by no means the best evidence of identity; and the examples put by way of illustration serve rather to disprove than to establish the rule. The court say that if grain be made into malt, it can not be reclaimed by the owner,...
Page 477 - The civil law in such a case would have required him who retained the whole of the mingled goods to account to the other for his share, (Just.
Page 475 - They agree in another respect, to wit, that if the chattel wrongfully taken, afterwards come into the hands of an innocent holder who believing himself to be the owner, converts the chattel into a thing of different species so that its identity is destroyed, the original owner cannot reclaim it. Such a change is said to be wrought when wheat is made into bread, olives into oil, or grapes into wine. In a case of this kind the change in the species of the chattel is not an intentional wrong to the...
Page 167 - So much depends on the nature and situation of the property, the uses to which it can be applied, or to which the owner or claimant may choose to apply it, that it is difficult to lay down any precise rule, adapted to all cases.

Bibliographic information