Reports of Cases at Law and in Chancery Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Illinois, Volume 232 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 46
... evidence of such policy , but it is no evidence whatever that the same public policy prevails in any other nation or government . Each nation or State having the power to adopt a constitution and legislate for itself neces- sarily has ...
... evidence of such policy , but it is no evidence whatever that the same public policy prevails in any other nation or government . Each nation or State having the power to adopt a constitution and legislate for itself neces- sarily has ...
Page 52
... evidence and determine on which side the preponderance was . Only the evidence favor- able to plaintiff could be considered , and if such evidence , with all the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom , would be sufficient to ...
... evidence and determine on which side the preponderance was . Only the evidence favor- able to plaintiff could be considered , and if such evidence , with all the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom , would be sufficient to ...
Page 53
... evidence before a jury . It is also argued that the evidence did not warrant an assessment of exemplary damages . There was no instruc- tion given to the jury which authorized an assessment of exemplary damages , and the question of the ...
... evidence before a jury . It is also argued that the evidence did not warrant an assessment of exemplary damages . There was no instruc- tion given to the jury which authorized an assessment of exemplary damages , and the question of the ...
Page 54
... evidence that they were tampered with . The fact that the ballots have been opened and counted upon an election contest does not preclude the admission of evidence to show that the ballots were tampered with . 2. SAME what does not ...
... evidence that they were tampered with . The fact that the ballots have been opened and counted upon an election contest does not preclude the admission of evidence to show that the ballots were tampered with . 2. SAME what does not ...
Page 56
... evidence , but they were all finally admitted and counted without any objection being made or an exception taken by either party . After the bal- lots were counted a large amount of evidence was pre- sented by appellant to show that ...
... evidence , but they were all finally admitted and counted without any objection being made or an exception taken by either party . After the bal- lots were counted a large amount of evidence was pre- sented by appellant to show that ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
affirmed alleged amount appellant's Appellate Court appellee assessment authority bill cause circuit court city council city of Chicago claimed coal commissioners complainant constitution construction contended contract conveyed Cook county corporation counsel county court court of Cook court of equity damages decree defendant in error delivered the opinion demurrer Dimond district election equity evidence execution fact fee simple filed February 20 Galesburg grant held Hugh Brown Hurd's Stat Illinois injury interest John Tice Judge judgment jurisdiction jury Kankakee land LaSalle county levy ment municipal negligence note and trust Onstott Opinion filed February ordinance owner paid parties person plaintiff in error plea precinct premises proceeding purchase purpose question quo warranto railroad company record remanded residence reversed statute street sub-way supra testified testimony tion town township track tract trial trust deed verdict vote witness writ of error
Popular passages
Page 41 - All penalties shall be proportioned to the nature of the offense; and no conviction shall work corruption of blood or forfeiture of estate ; nor shall any person be transported out of the State for any offense committed within the same.
Page 313 - the first general maxim of interpretation is, that it is not allowable to interpret what has no need of interpretation.
Page 295 - The true distinction, therefore, is, between the delegation of power to make the law, which necessarily involves a discretion as to what it shall be, and conferring an authority or discretion as to its execution, to be exercised under and in pursuance of the law. The first cannot be done; to the latter no valid objection can be made.
Page 605 - The first and great rule in the exposition of wills, to which all other rules must bend, is that the intention of the testator expressed in his will shall prevail, provided it be consistent with the rules of law.
Page 160 - The general assembly shall provide such revenue as may be needful by levying a tax, by valuation, so that every person and corporation shall pay a tax in proportion to the value of his, her or its property...
Page 313 - Implied are such as reason and justice dictate, and which therefore the law presumes that every man undertakes to perform.
Page 428 - No persons, individually or by combination, have the right to, directly or indirectly, interfere or disturb another in his lawful business or occupation, or to threaten to do so, for the sake of compelling him to do some act which, in his judgment, his own interest does not require.
Page 378 - ... this court. Finding no error in the record the judgment of the Appellate Court will be affirmed. Judgment affirmed.
Page 273 - No such company shall have the right to locate or construct its road upon or along any street or alley, or over any public ground in any incorporated city, town or village without the consent of the corporate authorities of such city, town or village...
Page 26 - Justice, sir, is the great interest of man on earth. It is the ligament which holds civilized beings and civilized nations together. Wherever her temple stands, and so long as it is duly honored, there is a foundation for social security, general happiness and the improvement and progress of our race.