Reports of Cases at Law and in Chancery Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Illinois, Volume 232 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 39
... judgment of the court of Pennsylvania therein set out was not a final judgment , and therefore not a bar to this action . I Herman on Estoppel , 27 , 65 ; 24 Am . & Eng . Ency . of Law , ( 2d ed . ) 793 ; 13 id . 24 ; Agnew v . Bank ...
... judgment of the court of Pennsylvania therein set out was not a final judgment , and therefore not a bar to this action . I Herman on Estoppel , 27 , 65 ; 24 Am . & Eng . Ency . of Law , ( 2d ed . ) 793 ; 13 id . 24 ; Agnew v . Bank ...
Page 48
... judgment , but the plaintiff was permitted to dismiss the case without preju- dice . The rule is without exception that a plea of res judi- cata must show a final judgment entered by a court of competent jurisdiction . ( 24 Am . & Eng ...
... judgment , but the plaintiff was permitted to dismiss the case without preju- dice . The rule is without exception that a plea of res judi- cata must show a final judgment entered by a court of competent jurisdiction . ( 24 Am . & Eng ...
Page 53
... judgment of the Appellate Court . The next ground of complaint is , that the attorney for the plaintiff , in his closing argument , made improper and prejudicial remarks to the jury for the purpose of inflam- ing their minds and biasing ...
... judgment of the Appellate Court . The next ground of complaint is , that the attorney for the plaintiff , in his closing argument , made improper and prejudicial remarks to the jury for the purpose of inflam- ing their minds and biasing ...
Page 101
... judgment rendered on con- tract against public policy . A judgment against a corporation ob- tained upon a contract which was in violation of the Anti - trust law will not be enforced by a court of equity against the corpora- tion nor ...
... judgment rendered on con- tract against public policy . A judgment against a corporation ob- tained upon a contract which was in violation of the Anti - trust law will not be enforced by a court of equity against the corpora- tion nor ...
Page 102
... judgment against the defendant the United States School Furniture Company for the sum of $ 32,417.42 damages and $ II costs , and that the judgment remained in full force and effect and unsatisfied ; that Loughlin had in October , 1901 ...
... judgment against the defendant the United States School Furniture Company for the sum of $ 32,417.42 damages and $ II costs , and that the judgment remained in full force and effect and unsatisfied ; that Loughlin had in October , 1901 ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
affirmed alleged amount appellant's Appellate Court appellee assessment authority bill cause circuit court city council city of Chicago claimed coal commissioners complainant constitution construction contended contract conveyed Cook county corporation counsel county court court of Cook court of equity damages decree defendant in error delivered the opinion demurrer Dimond district election equity evidence execution fact fee simple filed February 20 Galesburg grant held Hugh Brown Hurd's Stat Illinois injury interest John Tice Judge judgment jurisdiction jury Kankakee land LaSalle county levy ment municipal negligence note and trust Onstott Opinion filed February ordinance owner paid parties person plaintiff in error plea precinct premises proceeding purchase purpose question quo warranto railroad company record remanded residence reversed statute street sub-way supra testified testimony tion town township track tract trial trust deed verdict vote witness writ of error
Popular passages
Page 41 - All penalties shall be proportioned to the nature of the offense; and no conviction shall work corruption of blood or forfeiture of estate ; nor shall any person be transported out of the State for any offense committed within the same.
Page 313 - the first general maxim of interpretation is, that it is not allowable to interpret what has no need of interpretation.
Page 295 - The true distinction, therefore, is, between the delegation of power to make the law, which necessarily involves a discretion as to what it shall be, and conferring an authority or discretion as to its execution, to be exercised under and in pursuance of the law. The first cannot be done; to the latter no valid objection can be made.
Page 605 - The first and great rule in the exposition of wills, to which all other rules must bend, is that the intention of the testator expressed in his will shall prevail, provided it be consistent with the rules of law.
Page 160 - The general assembly shall provide such revenue as may be needful by levying a tax, by valuation, so that every person and corporation shall pay a tax in proportion to the value of his, her or its property...
Page 313 - Implied are such as reason and justice dictate, and which therefore the law presumes that every man undertakes to perform.
Page 428 - No persons, individually or by combination, have the right to, directly or indirectly, interfere or disturb another in his lawful business or occupation, or to threaten to do so, for the sake of compelling him to do some act which, in his judgment, his own interest does not require.
Page 378 - ... this court. Finding no error in the record the judgment of the Appellate Court will be affirmed. Judgment affirmed.
Page 273 - No such company shall have the right to locate or construct its road upon or along any street or alley, or over any public ground in any incorporated city, town or village without the consent of the corporate authorities of such city, town or village...
Page 26 - Justice, sir, is the great interest of man on earth. It is the ligament which holds civilized beings and civilized nations together. Wherever her temple stands, and so long as it is duly honored, there is a foundation for social security, general happiness and the improvement and progress of our race.