House Documents, Otherwise Publ. as Executive Documents: 13th Congress, 2d Session-49th Congress, 1st Session, Volume 1, Part 4

Front Cover
 

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Contents


Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 427 - in Article VI of the Treaty of Washington ; which calls upon the neutral State to " use due diligence to prevent the departure from its jurisdiction of any vessel intended to cruise or carry on war as above, such vessel having been specially adapted, in whole or in part, within such jurisdiction, to warlike use.
Page 313 - RULES. A neutral Government is bound— Secondly. Not to permit or suffer either belligerent to make use of its- ports or waters as the base of naval operations against the other, or for the purpose of the renewal or augmentation of military supplies or arms, or the recruitment of men. First. To
Page 17 - or carry on war against the United States, and also did not use like diligence to prevent the departure from its jurisdiction of every vessel intended to cruise or carry on war as above, such vessel having been specially adapted, in whole or in part, within such jurisdiction, to warlike use.
Page 267 - war against a power with which it is at peace ; and also to use like diligence to prevent the departure from its jurisdiction of any vessel intended to cruise or carry on war as above, such vessel having been especially adapted, in whole or in part, within
Page 489 - or carry on war as above, such vessel having been specially adapted, in whole or in part, within such jurisdiction, to warlike use. Note also the two following conditions, which are equally clear, "any vessel intended to cruise or carry on war," or "any vessel having been specially adapted in whole or in part to warlike use.
Page 175 - to prevent the departure from its jurisdiction "of a vessel which had "been specially adapted in whole or in part within such jurisdiction to warlike use," such departure is, in itself, a failure by Great Britain to fulfill the duties set forth in the Three
Page 450 - diligence to prevent the departure from its jurisdiction of any vessel intended to cruise or carry on war against a power with which it is at peace, such vessel baring been specially adapted in whole or in part within such jurisdiction to warlike use.
Page 513 - Britain permitted or suffered the insurgents " to make use of its ports or waters as the, base of naval operations against the United States," and that the supplies of coal were obtained at such ports to facilitate belligerent operations. 1. All naval warfare must, of necessity, have upon land
Page 147 - two countries arising out of those claims, the Arbitrators should assume that Her Majesty's Government had undertaken to act upon the principles set forth in these Rules." V. The true force of the subordinate provision that, besides the Rules, •• such principles of International Law, not inconsistent therewith, as the Arbitrators shall determine to have been appli-
Page 186 - did not use due diligence to prevent the fitting out, arming, or equipping, within its jurisdiction, of certain vessels, which it had reasonable grounds to believe, were intended to cruise or carry on war against the United States. (b) The British Government did not use like diligence to prevent the departure from its jurisdiction of certain vessels to carry

Bibliographic information