Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Ohio Circuit Courts...: Ohio Circuit Decisions, Volume 21Laning printing Company, 1911 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affirmed alimony alleged amended appear apply authority averment Bank cause charge Cincinnati Circ Circuit Court claim coal common pleas court concur contract corporation counsel court of common Cuyahoga Cuyahoga County decree defendant in error demurrer divorce duty ERROR to Hamilton evidence fact filed Frank McCormick Franklin County Gainor Giffen and Smith Hamilton 1st Hamilton common pleas Hamilton County husband indictment injury Insurance interest intoxicating liquors Judge judgment jury legislature license Lucas County mortgage motion N. E. Rep N. Y. Supp negligence Ohio St option law ordinance parties payment person petition plaintiff in error proceeding proof prosecution purpose question railroad railway company reason Stark County Stat statute Sunday Creek supra Supreme Court sustained Syllabus approved thereof tion Toledo trial verdict wife Wilson
Popular passages
Page 228 - To justify the State in thus interposing its authority in behalf of the public, it must appear, first, that the interests of the public generally, as distinguished from those of a particular class, require such interference; and, second, that the means are reasonably necessary for the accomplishment of the purpose, and not unduly oppressive upon individuals.
Page 656 - There must be reasonable evidence of negligence; but where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as in the ordinary course of things does not happen if those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendant, that the accident arose from want of care.
Page 410 - ... this insurance, as to the interest of the mortgagee (or trustee) only therein, shall not be invalidated by any act or neglect of the mortgagor or owner...
Page 23 - An Act to promote the safety of employees and travelers upon railroads by compelling common carriers engaged in interstate commerce to equip their cars with automatic couplers and continuous brakes and their locomotives with driving-wheel brakes, and for other purposes...
Page 58 - that the council shall have the care, supervision and control of all public highways, streets, avenues, alleys, sidewalks, public grounds and bridges within the corporation, and shall cause the same to be kept open and in repair and free from nuisance.
Page 297 - ... the delivery may be shown to -have been conditional, or for a special purpose only, and not for the purpose of transferring the property in the instrument.
Page 23 - January, eighteen hundred and ninetyeight, it shall be unlawful for any such common carrier to haul or permit to be hauled or used on its line any car used in moving interstate traffic not equipped with couplers coupling automatically by impact, and which can be uncoupled without the necessity of men going between the ends of the cars.
Page 118 - Upon the question of the effect of this test upon the plaintiff's right of rescission the trial judge charged the jury as follows: "If you find from the evidence that the plaintiff...
Page 389 - ... anything of value which shall come into his possession or under his care by virtue of his employment...
Page 569 - An action may be brought by any person in possession, by himself or his tenant of real property, against any person who claims an estate or interest therein adverse to him. for the purpose of determining such adverse claim, estate or interest.