...having jurisdiction of the question, must be taken as beyond controversy. The principle is this ; " When private property is devoted to a public use, it is subject to public regulations." And this is more especially true, when the owner has either a legal or a virtual monopoly...

...the United States supreme court, reiterated a well founded Opinion, per HOUGH, J. principle, to-wit: "When private property is devoted to a public use, it is subject to public regulation." In AHnutt v. Inglis, 12 East, 527, Lord Ellenborough said: "There is no doubt that the general principle...

...who takes the benefit of a monopoly. Mr. Chief Justice Waite referring to the public-use basis said: "When private property is devoted to a public use it is subject to public regulation." That monopolies and contracts and agreements directly producing restraints in trade (8) Mayor of Mobile...

...legislation they were examining, the opinion continues as follows: " Knough has already been said to show that when private property is devoted to a public use it is subject to public regulation. It remains only to ascertain whether the warehouses of these plaintiffs in error and the business which...

...Lord Hale has so forcibly stated. But we need not go further. Enough has already been said to show that when private property is devoted to a public use it is subject to public regulation. It remains only to ascertain whether the warehouses of these plaintiffs in error and the business which...

...interest he has thus created'' * * * " But we need not go further. Enough has already been said to show that when private property is devoted to a public use it is subject to public regulation. It remains only to ascertain whether the warehouses of these plaintiffs in error, and the business...

...Lord Hale has so forcibly stated. But we need not go further. Enough has already been eaid to show that when private property is devoted to a public use it is subject to public regulation. It remains only to ascertain whether the warehouses of these plaintiffs iu error, and the business...

...Lord Hale has so forcibly stated. But we need not go further. Enough has already been said to show that when private property is devoted to a public use it is subject to a public regulation." 3 In the charter of the Winona and St. Peter's Railroad there was a provision...

...Lord Hale has so forcibly stated. But we need not go further. Enough has already been said to show that when private property is devoted to a public use it is subject to a public regulation." 3 In the charter of the Winona and St. Peter's Railroad there was a provision...

...Lord Hale has so forcibly stated. But we need not go further. Enough has already been said to show that, when private property is devoted to a public use, it is subject to public regulation. It remains only to ascertain whether the warehouses of these plaintiffs in error, and the business...