Federal Environmental Pesticide Control Act of 1971: Hearings, Ninety-second Congress, Second Session, on H.R. 10729 ... June 15 and 19, 1972
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1972 - 275 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action additional Administrator adverse advisory committee Agency Agriculture amendment appear application areas Association authority believe benefits bill cancellation Chairman changes chemical Committee concerning considered contains continued court crops dangerous decision Department determine developed device direct Drug economic effects environment Environmental established evidence examiner fact farm farmers Federal filed findings given Government groups Hart hazard hearing human important industry interest involved issue label legislation levels manufacturers matter means ment mercury necessary notice objections officer party period permit person pest pesticide plant poisoning possible practice present problem proceedings proposed protection provisions question reason record referred registration regulations relating request responsible restricted result risk safety scientific Senate specific statement Subcommittee submitted substantial suggested suspension term testimony tests tion toxic trade secret United workers
Page 253 - Any poisonous or deleterious substance added to any food, except where such substance is required in the production thereof or cannot be avoided by good manufacturing practice...
Page 6 - commercial applicator" means a certified applicator (whether or not he is a private applicator with respect to some uses) who uses or supervises the use of any pesticide which is classified for restricted use for any purpose or on any property other than as provided by paragraph (2) . (4) Under the direct supervision of a certified applicator.
Page 153 - A trade secret may consist of any formula, pattern, device or compilation of information which is used in one's business, and which gives him an opportunity to obtain an advantage over competitors who do not know or use it.
Page 271 - ... the admissibility of the evidence contained in such statement shall be subject to the same rules as if such testimony were produced in the usual manner, including the right of cross-examination of the witness.
Page 154 - ... may consist of any formula, pattern, device or compilation of information which is used in one's business, and which gives him an opportunity to obtain an advantage over competitors who do not know or use it. It may be a formula for a chemical compound, a process of manufacturing, treating or preserving materials, a pattern for a machine or other device, or a list of customers.
Page 41 - Nothing in this Act shall be construed as requiring the Secretary to report for prosecution, or for the institution of libel or injunction proceedings, minor violations of this Act whenever he believes that the public interest will be adequately served by a suitable written notice or warning.
Page 53 - Secretary thereupon shall file in the court the record of the proceedings on which he based his action, as provided in section 2112 of title 28, United States Code. Upon the filing of such petition, the court shall have jurisdiction to affirm the action of the Secretary or to set it aside, in whole or in part, temporarily or permanently, but until the filing of the record, the Secretary may modify or set aside his order.
Page 263 - Secretary may, when he finds that such action is necessary to prevent an imminent hazard to the public, by order, suspend the registration of an economic poison immediately. In such case, he shall give the registrant prompt notice of such action and afford the registrant the opportunity to have the matter submitted to an advisory committee and for an expedited hearing under this section.
Page 262 - Secretary that the article is such as to warrant the proposed claims for it or if the article and its labeling and other material required to be submitted do not comply with the provisions of this...
Page 27 - (3) Whenever the Administrator determines after public hearing that a State is not administering a program approved under this section in accordance with requirements of this section, he shall so notify the State and, if appropriate corrective action is not taken within a reasonable time, not to exceed ninety days, the Administrator shall withdraw approval of such program.