 | 1924 - 960 pages
...classes of cases, a principle of substantive law which has been established by statute or decisions. But no rule of court can enlarge or restrict jurisdiction....courts make for their own guidance under authority conferred.7 It remains to consider the purpose of Eule 50. The cross-libel, unlike the cross-bill in... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1924 - 856 pages
...classes of cases, a principle of substantive law which has been established by statute or decisions. But no rule of court can enlarge or restrict jurisdiction....inferior tribunals, as it is of those rules which « Act of July 20, 1892, c. 209, § 1, 27 Stat. 252; Bradford v. Southern Ry. Co., 195 US 243; Act... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1925 - 1420 pages
...classes of cases, a principle of substantive law which has been established by statute or decisions. But no rule of court can enlarge or restrict jurisdiction....inferior tribunals, as it is of those rules which [636] lower courts make for their own guidance under authority conferred.7 It remains to consider the... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1926 - 1158 pages
...ed. 271; United States ex rel. Angarica v. Bayard, 127 US 251, 32 L. ed. 159, 8 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1156. No rule of court can enlarge or restrict jurisdiction....can a rule abrogate or modify the substantive law. Washington-Southern Nav. Co. v. Baltimore & PSB Co. 263 US 629, €35, 68 L. ed. 480, 483, 44 Sup.... | |
 | 1928 - 1066 pages
...Washington-Southern Co. v. Baltimore Co., 263 Ü. S. 629, 44 S. Ct. 220, 68 L. Ed. 480, it was said : "But no rule of court can enlarge or restrict jurisdiction....apply be one of law, of equity, or of admiralty." Obviously, rule 30 was not intended to abrogate section 48. As power did not exist to abrogate section... | |
 | 1928 - 1120 pages
...In Washington-Southern Co. v. Baltimore Co., 263 US 629, 44 S. Ct. 220, 68 L. Ed. 480, it was said : "But no rule of court can enlarge or restrict jurisdiction....apply be one of law, of equity, or of admiralty." Obviously, rule 30 was not intended to abrogate section 48. As power did not exist to abrogate section... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, Palmer Daniel Edmunds - 1938 - 782 pages
...classes of cases, a principle of substantive law which has been established by statute or decisions. But no rule of court can enlarge or restrict jurisdiction....for their own guidance under authority conferred." A rule of court authorized by statute has the force of law. Weil v. Neary, 278 US 160; 73 L. Ed. 243,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1925 - 1420 pages
...classes of cases, a principle of substantive law which has been established by statute or decisions. But no rule of court can enlarge or restrict jurisdiction. Nor can «Act of July 20, 1892, i-liap. 200. S 1, 27 Stat. at L. 252, Сотр. Stnt. § 102<>, 2 Fed. Stat.... | |
 | United States. Tax Court - 1979 - 1352 pages
...classes of cases, a principle of substantive law which has been established by statute or decisions. But no rule of court can enlarge or restrict jurisdiction....can a rule abrogate or modify the substantive law. * * * [ Washington-Southern Co. v. Baltimore Co., 263 US 629, 635 (1924); emphasis added.] Clymer v.... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1925 - 1140 pages
...classes of cases, a principle of substantive law which has been established by statute or decisions. But no rule of court can enlarge or restrict jurisdiction....inferior tribunals, as it is of those rules which [636J lower courts make for their own guidance under authority conferred.7 It remains to consider the... | |
| |
Most rules are merely a formulation of the previous practice of the courts. Occasionally, a rule is employed to express, in convenient form, as applicable to certain classes of cases, a principle of substantive law which has been established by statute... 