 | New York (State). Superior Court (New York), Joseph S. Bosworth - 1861 - 780 pages
...defendants' exceptions are well taken, the verdict should not be disturbed. The defendants excepted to the refusal of the Court to submit to the jury the proposition embraced in their request to the Court to charge, that " if, when the appraisers were last... | |
 | New York (State). Superior Court (New York), James Clark Spencer, Samuel Jones - 1874 - 646 pages
...kindred authorities, then I am of opinion that the other exception should not be sustained. It was to the refusal of the court to submit to the jury the question whether the defendants were injured by the laches or negligence of the plainDissenting opinion of SEDOWICK,... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1912 - 666 pages
...Case, I feel obliged to make but this observation. In that case the principal assigned errors related to the refusal of the court to submit to the jury the issue of self-defense, the rulings made against the defendant subjecting him to a crossexamination... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1881 - 968 pages
...tracted illness as well as to the permanent deformity of the limb. The evidence is amply sufficient to submit to the jury the question of contributory negligence on the part of the defendant in error. If they find the parents of the boy were in charge of and nursed him during... | |
 | 1881 - 508 pages
...protracted illness as well as to the permanent deformity of the limb. The evidence is amply sufficient to submit to the jury the question of contributory negligence on the part of the defendant in error. If they find the parents of the boy were in charge of and nursed him during... | |
 | New York (State). Court of Appeals, George Franklin Comstock, Henry Rogers Selden, Francis Kernan, Erasmus Peshine Smith, Joel Tiffany, Edward Jordan Dimock, Samuel Hand, Hiram Edward Sickels, Louis J. Rezzemini, Edmund Hamilton Smith, Edwin Augustus Bedell, Alvah S. Newcomb, James Newton Fiero - 1883 - 820 pages
...alleged estoppel, presented on the argument. They are considered in our former opinion. The exception to the refusal of the court to submit to the jury the question of the original validity of the policies, and whether they had been affirmed by the company, was not... | |
 | 1883 - 632 pages
...assigning for error the answer to his first point, the portions of the charge above set forth, and the refusal of the Court to submit to the jury the question of the change of ownership. Siiiwell (with him Johnson), for plaintiff in error. The delivery by the... | |
 | 1916 - 1232 pages
...have done was properly submitted to the Jury. Under all the evidence. It was not reversible error to submit to the jury the question of contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff. Each case must be governed by Its own peculiar facts, and a rational rather than distinctively... | |
| |
Appellant's third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, and twenty-second assignments of error relate to the refusal of the court to submit to the jury the question of contributory negligence on the part of... 
