 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1892 - 830 pages
...the following reasons: 1. That it is contrary to article 4, § 20, of the Constitution, which says: " No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title." 2. That it confers upon military officers the power of arbitrarily setting aside the authority of the... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1862 - 614 pages
...being in conflict with the first clause of the 20th section of Article IV. of the Constitution — " No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title." — 5 La. Ann. Rep. 91; 6 La. Ann. Rep. 94 ; 11 La. Ann. Rep. 722; 13 La. Ann. Rep, 433; 5 Ind. 573;... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1914 - 828 pages
...therefore that, as to those provisions, the act was invalid under section 21, art. 5, of the Constitution : "No law shall embrace more than one object which shall be expressed in its title." This law is penal in character. One convicted for a violation of its provisions is liable to both fine... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1913 - 804 pages
...void under section 21 of article 5 of the Constitution of the State of Michigan, which provides : " No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title." The title of the act is as follows : "An act to declare telephone lines and telephone companies within... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1891 - 776 pages
...the constitutional provision as claimed by defendant's counsel. This constitutional provision is — "No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title." This provision requires that the title shall fairly indicate the general object of the law. Mr. Cooley,... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1885 - 744 pages
...provisions of the Constitution with which this Act conflicts : 1st. Sec. 20, art. IV., which provides, "No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title." 2d. Sec. 27, art. VI. which provides, " The right of trial by jury shall remain, but shall be deemed... | |
 | 1852 - 680 pages
...the final passage of all bills, the vote shall be by ayes and nays, and entered on the journal. 20. No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title. No public act shall take effect or be in force until the expiration of ninety days from the end of... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1866 - 616 pages
...Ibid. 14. Legislative acts, ffieir title. — The provision of the constitution, (Sec. 20, Art. 4,) that "no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its titie," was designed to prevent, 1st, the joining in the same bill subjects diverse in their natures,... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1882 - 758 pages
...is one made by defendant in error that the act of 1871 conflicted with the constitutional provision that " no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in the title," and therefore never became a law. The object, it is said, was not disclosed by the title... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1891 - 796 pages
...example, as that which forbids any bills to be introduced after the first 50 days of the session, or that which provides that no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be clearly expressed in its title. Third. The Legislature may attempt to prescribe a rule of action which... | |
| |
No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title... 
