...against receivers appointed by a federal court, without leave of the appointing court, is limited " in respect of any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business connected with such property." 25 St. 436, § 3- It does not include a demand arising prior to such appointment. The principle upon...

...we are of the opinion that there is not. The act of March 3, 1887, declares that "every receiver . may be sued in respect of any act or transaction of...property, without the previous leave of the court in which said receiver or manager was appointed." We agree with the Supreme Court of Illinois that it was not...

...the resident agent of a non-resident receiver.17 A recent statute changes the practice as follows : " Every receiver or manager of any property appointed...United States may be sued in respect of any act or transac7 Kennedy v. IC & LR Co., 3 Fed. 11 Farmers's L. & Tr. Co. v. Centrnl R. 97; Union Trust Co....

...554, and Act Aug. 13, 1888, c. SG6, 25 Stat. 436 [US Cpmp. St. 1901, p. 582], which reads as follows: "That every receiver or manager of any property, appointed...court of the United States, may be sued in respect to any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business connected with such property, without...

...court." This was the general rule in the absence of statute, but it is now provided by Act of Congress that "every receiver or manager -of any property appointed by any court of the United States may l»e sued in respect of any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business connected with such...

...managing the carrying on same under the direction of any court of this state, may be sued in respect to any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business connected with such property or corporation without the previous leave of the court by whom or in which such receiver, assignee...

...Fed. Hep. 189.) § 231 (3) That every receiver may be sued vri HIOM t previous leave of court. — Every receiver or manager of any property appointed by any court of the U nited States may be sued in respect of any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business...

...commensurate to the mischiefs which were intended to be remedied by it. The word "every," and the clause "may be sued in respect of any act or transaction of his," found in section 3, should not receive the narrow and restricted construction contended for by plaintiffin...

...the discretion of the court. (Sec. 2 of Act of August 13, 1888.) § 68. Receiver jnsij be sued. — That every receiver or manager of any property appointed by any court 9f the United States may be sued in respect of any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business...

...leave of the court wherein the receiver was appointed. That act declares that " Every receiver .... may be sued in respect of any act or transaction of...property without the previous leave of the court in which said receiver or manager was appointed." The language of this statute is broad enough to include actions...