| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1952 - 592 pages
...standard Form 23 this disputes article is designated as article 6. It reads as follows: DISPUTES.. — Except as otherwise specifically provided in this...contract shall be decided by the contracting officer who shall reduce his decision to writing and mail or otherwise furnish a copy thereof to the contractor.... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1952 - 160 pages
...standard Form 23 this disputes article is designated as article 6. It reads as follows: DISPUTES. — Except as otherwise specifically provided in this...contract shall be decided by the contracting officer who shall reduce his decision to writing and mail or otherwise furnish a copy thereof to the contractor.... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs - 1953 - 1218 pages
...specifically provided in this contract, all questions of fact involved in disputes arising under the contract shall be decided by the Contracting officer,...subject to written appeal by the Contractor within thirty (30) days, to the Administrator of General Services Administration or his duly authorized representatives.... | |
| United States. General Accounting Office - 1955 - 968 pages
...article provided that all disputes concerning questions of fact arising under the contract were to be decided by the contracting officer subject to written...contractor within 30 days to the "Head of the Department," or his duly authorized representative, whose decision was to be final and conclusive. Notice to proceed... | |
| 1957 - 1214 pages
...a clause, under which certain disputes arising under the contract and not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the contracting officer subject...written appeal by the contractor, within 30 days, addressed to "the head of the department," or "his duly authorized representative." (b) Finality of... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services - 1958 - 756 pages
...contract. Only the contracting officer had the authority to make such a finding, subject to appeal to the head of the department concerned or his duly authorized representative. On January 16, 1957, a letter dated January 14, 1957, was received from Mr. Edwin J. McDermott of Philadelphia,... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services - 1959 - 180 pages
...final and conclusive on the parties hereto, subject only to appeal within 30 days, by the contractor to the head of the department concerned or his duly authorized representative, whose decision in such appeals as to the facts of delay and the extension of time for making delivery shall be final... | |
| |