...otherwise reviewed on the record of an agency hearing provided by statute; or (F) unwarranted by the facts to the extent that the facts are subject to trial de novo by the reviewing court. 1л making the foregoing determinations, the court shall review the whole record or those parts of...

...otherwise reviewed on the record of an agency hearing provided by statute; or (F) unwarranted by the facts to the extent that the facts are subject to trial...determinations, the court shall review the whole record or those parts of it cited by a party, and due account shall be taken of the rule of prejudicial error....

...otherwise reviewed on the record of an agency hearing provided by statute; or (F) unwarranted by the facts to the extent that the facts are subject to trial...determinations, the court shall review the whole record or those parts of it cited by a party, and due account shall be taken of the rule of prejudicial error....

...otherwise reviewed on the record of an agency hearing provided by statute; or (F) unwarranted by the facts to the extent that the facts are subject to trial de novo by the reviewing court. APPENDIX TO TITLE 5, USC (INSPECTOR GENERAL ACT OF 1978) REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL ENTITIES AND DESIGNATED...

...law; (2) not made consistent with required procedures; or (3) unsupported by substantial evidence. In making the foregoing determinations, the court shall review the whole record, or those parts of it cited by a party, and due account shall be taken of the rule of prejudicial error....

...unsupported by substantial evidence, the court shall review the whole record or those parts of it cited by a party, and due account shall be taken of the rule of prejudicial error. (d) Any district court reviewing under this section the decision, findings, and determinations of an...

...an agency hearing provided by statute; or (F) unwarranted by the facts to the extent that the facto are subject to trial de novo by the reviewing court...determinations, the court shall review the whole record or those parts of it cited by a party, and due account shall be taken of the rule of prejudicial error....

...procedure required by law; E unsupported by substantial evidence. . . . F unwarranted by the facts to the extent that the facts are subject to trial de novo by the reviewing court. (5 USC§706) The use of the courts in reviewing rulemaking is very frequent. However, the judiciary's...

...the bill would permit the board to set aside an agency action found to be unwarranted by the facts to the extent that the facts are subject to trial de novo. While the intent may not be to expressly authorize de novo review, the bill clearly leaves open the...

...the bill would permit the board to set aside an agency action found to be unwarranted by the facts to the extent that the facts are subject to trial de novo. While the intent may not be to expressly authorize de novo review, the bill clearly leaves open the...