 | John Fitzgerald Duffy - 2005 - 340 pages
...First, always, is the question whether Congress has directly spoken to the precise question at issue. If the intent of Congress is clear, that is the end...to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress. If, however, the court determines Congress has not directly addressed the precise question at issue,... | |
 | David J. Mullan - 2006 - 513 pages
...First, always, is the question whether Congress has directly spoken to the precise question at issue. If the intent of Congress is clear, that is the end...to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress. If, however, the court determines Congress has not directly addressed the precise question at issue,... | |
 | 268 pages
...within the bounds of the Constitution. If Congress has directly spoken to the precise issue in question, if the intent of Congress is clear, that is the end of the matter." 74 There, however, a 5-4 majority of the Court found the administration's actions as a reasonable construction... | |
 | Jeffrey S. Lubbers - 2006 - 736 pages
...time)"). See also supra Part I(B). (1) Has Congress "directly" spoken to the "precise" question at issue? "If the intent of Congress is clear, that is the end...the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress";'"' and (2) If Congress has not done so, and the statute is "silent or ambiguous with respect to the specific... | |
 | United States. Department of Agriculture - 2001 - 458 pages
...842. First "is the question whether Congress has directly spoken to the precise question at issue. If the intent of Congress is clear, that is the end...unambiguously expressed intent of Congress." Id. at 842-43. If this first question is answered in the negative, then "the question for the court is whether the... | |
 | Administrative Conference of the United States - 1992 - 390 pages
...First, always, is the question whether Congress has directly spoken to the precise question at issue. If the intent of Congress is clear, that is the end...to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress. If, however, the court determines Congress has not directly addressed the precise question at issue,... | |
 | 44 pages
...courts will not give advisory opinions." § 3529.1 28 But cf Chevron. 467 US at 843, 859-64 (explaining, "If the intent of Congress is clear, that is the end...the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress.") 29 See. eg. Salant Corp. v. United States. 86 F. Supp.2d 1301, 1306 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2000) (involving... | |
 | United States. Department of Agriculture - 1994 - 674 pages
...examined to determine if •ess has spoken to the precise question at issue. "If the intent of •ess is clear, that is the end of the matter; for the court as well as the y must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress." 842-43, 104 S.Ct. at 2781. If... | |
| |
When a court reviews an agency's construction of the statute which it administers, it is confronted with two questions. First, always, is the question whether Congress has directly spoken to the precise question at issue. If the intent of Congress is... 
