...Having, as we have seen, absolute dominion over the patented article during the period of the patent (Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co., 210 US 405), he may use his invention or not at his pleasure, and may exact for the use of it by others any price,...

...possibility that suppression of an invention might be grounds for judicial refusal to enforce a patent, see Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co., 210 US 405, 430 (1908), the Court has so far not found such Bippression. See Special Equipment Co. v. Coe, 324...

...possibility that suppression of an invention might be grounds for judicial refusal to enforce a patent, see Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co., 210 US 405, 430 (1908), the Court has so far not found such wppression. See Special Equipment Co. v. Coe, 324 US...

...at 859 (Nov. 1989). 21 Special Equipment Co. v. Coe, 324 US 370, 65 S.Ct. 741, 89 L.Ed. 1006 (1945); Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co., 210 US 405, 28 S.Ct. 748, 52 L.Ed. 1122 (1908). See SCM v. Xerox Corp., 645 F.2d 1195 (2d Cir. 1981). See also:...

...10 from a patent the right to exclude others from its use for the time prescribed in the statute." Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co., 210 US 405, 425 (1908)." Indeed, it is recognized that, "The very nature of the patent right is the right to exclude...

...more than a full century. The early case law is summarized by one pronouncement nearly 75 years ago. Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co. , 210 US 405, 425 (1908) , quoting with approval from Bloomer v. McQuewan, 14 How. 539, 549: The franchise which...

...receives from a patent the right to exclude others from its use for the time prescribed in the statute." Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.. 210 US 405, 425 (1908).4 Indeed, it is recognized that, "The very nature of the patent right is the right to exclude...

...patented combination, even though patent holder never had used or manufactured subcombination by itself): Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co., 210 US 405, 428-429, 28 S.Ct. 748, 52 L.Ed. 1122 (1908) (where expense of modifying existing plant to practice...

...right of a patent owner to sit on the patent while refusing to allow all others to use it. See eg, Continental Paper Bag Co., v. Eastern Paper Bag Co., 210 US 405, 424-25 (1908); See also United States v. Studiengesellschaft Kohle, mb.H. 670 F. 2d 1122 (DC Cir. 1981)....

...p. 859 (Nov. 1989). 21 Special Equipment Co. v. Coe, 324 US 370, 65 S.Ct. 741, 89 L.Ed. 1006 (1945); Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co., 210 US 405, 28 S.Ct. 748, 52 L.Ed. 1122 (1908). See SCM v. Xerox Corp., 645 F.2d 1195 (2d Cir. 1981), cert, denied...