 In conferring upon Congress the regulation of commerce, it was never intended to cut the states off from legislating on all subjects relating to the health, life, and safety of their citizens, though the legislation might indirectly affect the commerce...  Albany Law Journal - Page 791877Full view - About this book
 | New York (State). Department of Agriculture - 1895 - 1382 pages
...Sherlock v. Ailing, 93 US 99, 103: "In conferring upon Congress the regulation of commerce, it was never intended to cut the States off from legislating...regulation of it within the meaning of the Constitution. * * And it may be said generally, that the legislation of a State, not directed against commerce or... | |
 | New York (State) Dept. of Agriculture - 1895 - 1378 pages
...Sherlock v. Allin f/, 93 US 99, 103: "In conferring upon Congress the regulation of commerce, it was never intended to cut the States off from legislating...relating to the health, life, and safety of their citi/.ens, though the legislation might indirectly affect the commerce of the country. Legislation,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1895 - 764 pages
...Sherlock v. Ailing, 93 US 99, 103 : " In conferring upon Congress the regulation of commerce, it was never intended to cut the States off from legislating on all subjects relating to the health, life, anil safety of their citizens, though the legislation might indirectly affect the commerce of the country.... | |
 | Wisconsin. Dairy and Food Commission - 1896 - 336 pages
...Sherlock v. Ailing, 93 US, 99, 103: 'In conferring upon congress the regulation of commerce, it was never intended to cut the states off from legislating...constituting a regulation of it within the meaning of the constituiion. .... And it may be said generally, that the legislation of a state, not directed against... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1896 - 772 pages
...v. Massachusetts, 155 US 461, that "in conferring upon Congress the regulation of commerce, it was never intended to cut the States off from legislating...ways, may affect commerce and persons engaged in it withOpinion of the Court. out constituting a regulation of it, within the meaning of the Constitution,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1896 - 770 pages
...Ailing, 93 US 99, 102, where it was said: "In conferring upon Congress the regulation of commerce, it was never intended to cut the States off from legislating...affect the commerce of the country. Legislation, in a variety of ways, may affect commerce and persons engaged in it without constituting a regulation of... | |
 | 1896 - 746 pages
...93 US 99, 102, where it was said: " In conferring upon congress the regulation of commerce, it was never intended to cut the states off from legislating...affect the commerce of the country. Legislation, in a variety of ways, may affect commerce and persons engaged in it without constituting a regulation of... | |
 | 1896 - 772 pages
...v. Massachusetts, 155 US 462, that, "in conferring upon congress the regulation of commerce, it was never intended to cut the states off from legislating...safety of their citizens, though the legislation might. Louisville & Nashville R. Co. e. Keutucky indirectly affect the commerce of the country. Legislation... | |
 | New York (State). Supreme Court. Appellate Division - 1898 - 738 pages
...boundaries. As was remarked in Hall v. De Cuir (95 US 487) : " Legislation may, in a great variety of ways, affect commerce and persons engaged in it without...regulation of it within the meaning of the Constitution '' (citing authorities), and "the line which separates the powers of the States from this exclusive... | |
 | Michigan. Office of Dairy and Food Commissioner - 1897 - 134 pages
...Sherlock v. Allitig, 93 I'. S. 99, 103: "In conferring upon Congress the regulation of commerce, it was never intended to cut the States off from legislating...regulation of it within the meaning of the Constitution. . . And it may be said generally, that the legislation of a State, not directed against commerce or... | |
| |
