...the superiority of Robertson, in whose History we find such penetration — such painting?' JOHNSON. 'Sir, you must consider how that penetration and that...Robertson's work as romance, and try it by that standard 2. History it is not. Besides, Sir, it is the great excellence of a writer to put into his book as...

...superiority of Robertson, in whose History we find such penetration, — such painting? " JOHNSON. " Sir, you must consider how that penetration and that...Joshua paints faces in a history-piece : he imagines an heroick countenance. You must look upon Robertson's work as romance, and try it by that standard. History...

...penetration, such painting ?" JOHNSON. " Sir, you must consider how that penetration and that paint iug are employed. It is not history, it is imagination....describes what he never saw, draws from fancy. Robertson pawits minds as Sir Joshua paints faces in a history-piece : he imagines an heroic countenance. You...

...the superiority of Kobertson, in whose History "we find such penetration, such painting?" JCIIKSOIT: "Sir, you must consider "how that penetration and...who describes what he never saw, draws from fancy. Kobertson " paints minds аз Sir Joshua paints faces in a history-piece : he imagines an heroic "countenance....

...the superiority of Robertson, in whose history we find such penetration — such painting'?" JOHNSON: i A tele . ne muigiuca an jieruu; t-uuiiienance. ion .,iust look upon Robertson's work as romance, and...

...the superiority of Robertson, in whose history we find such penetration, such painting?" Johnson. — "Sir, you must consider how that penetration and that...history-piece ; he imagines an heroic countenance. You must ©pinions on tbe •Roman f>istorg 299 look upon Robertson's work as romance, and try it by that standard....

...the superiority of Robertson, in whose history wefind such penetration — such painting?" JOHNSON: " inahistory piece ; he imagines an heroic countenance. You must look upon Robertson's work as romance,...

...superiority of Robertson, in whose History we find such penetration, — such painting ? " JOHNSON. " Sir, you must consider how that penetration and that...employed. It is not history, it is imagination. He 1 Not in the " Tale of a Tub," but in the " History of John Bull." who describes what he never saw,...

...the superiority of Robertson, in whose History1 we find such penetration, such painting ?" JOHNBON. " Sir, you must consider how that penetration and that...describes what he never saw, draws from fancy. Robertson painta minds as Sir Joshua paints faces in a history-piece : he imagines an heroic countenance. You...

...the superiority of Robertson, in whose history we find such penetration, such painting?" Johnson. — "Sir, you must consider how that penetration and that...romance, and try it by that standard. History it is 5 not. Besides, sir, it is the great excellence of a writer to put into his. book as much as his book...