...United States internal revenue collector, granted by a state court upon the petition of a sheriff, to show cause why an attachment should not issue against him for contempt of the process of the latter court in refusing to permit the sheriff to enter a bonded warehouse...

...cause depending in court. Jienpublicn v. Oswald. . . *319 8. When the defendant is present, on a rule to show cause why an attachment should not issue against him for a contempt, the court will not make the rule absolute; but proceed to give judgment for the offence Id. See REFERENCE,...

...having been made " officiously, arbitrarily and illegally " : a rule was granted requiring the defendant to show cause why an attachment should not issue against him for contempt (k). In a subsequent case, an information was filed by the Libel on Lord Attorney-General...

...peace was received, March 13th. On the 22d of March the United States District Court ordered Jackson to show cause why an attachment should not issue against him for contempt of court, in wresting an original document from the court, disobeying the writ of habeas corpus,...

...criminal contempts, such personal presence is held to be necessary.67 Where a party is under a rule to show cause why an attachment should not issue against him for a contempt, if he relies upon an exc\ise only, he should appear in his own proper person. Where he fails to do...

...court heretofore made upon him upon the 28th day of January, 1913, and for this his return to the order to show cause why an attachment should not issue against him for contempt of this court, says : "L "That the citation filed herein does not state facts sufficient to...

...person without orders from military headquarters. On motion of Quid's counsel the court ordered Smith to show cause why an attachment should not issue against him for contempt in not obeying the court's order. On that day Smith appeared, produced the prisoner, amended...

...officially advised of the termination of hostilities, are triumphantly set forth in an answer to the rule to show cause why an attachment should not issue against him for the alleged contempt of Court; and your Committee think they could not do justice to the subject without...

...officially advised of the termination of hostilities, are triumphantly set forth in an answer to the rule to show cause why an attachment should not issue against him for the alleged contempt of Court; and your Committee think they could not do justice to the subject without...

...hearing of the order granted by Hon. JB MePherson on the 10th day of April, 1905, requiring the defendant to show cause why an attachment should not issue against him for contempt of an injunction of the court, the defendant, Morris Starrells, will admit that the cap marked...