 No reason is perceived why, if Congress chooses to provide that certain designated subjects of interstate commerce shall be governed by a rule which divests them of that character at an earlier period of time than would otherwise be the case, it is not...  Albany Law Journal - Page 291892Full view - About this book
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Interstate Commerce - 1914 - 330 pages
...State laws in dealing with such property" (p. 561). " No reason is perceived why, if Congress choses to provide that certain designated' subjects of interstate...the case, it is not within its competency to do so." (562.) These cases are so directly in point that further citation of authority is hardly necessary,... | |
 | Owen Reed Lovejoy - 1914 - 42 pages
...Kansas law forbade the sale). Chief Justice Fuller: "No reason is perceived why, if Congress chooses to provide that certain designated subjects of interstate...the case, it is not within its competency to do so." If we correctly interpret the Court this means that Congress has power, not only to enforce the laws... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Labor - 1914 - 102 pages
...Kansas law forbade the sale.) Chief Justice Fuller. " No reason is perceived why, if Congress chooses to provide that certain designated subjects of interstate commerce shall be governed by a rule which t divests them of that character at an earlier period of time than would otherwise be the case, it... | |
 | Eugene Wambaugh - 1915 - 1106 pages
...property in the country or State. 12 Wheat. 448. No reason is perceived why, if Congress chooses to provide that certain designated subjects of interstate...which have existed in this tribunal in many leading cases upon this subject, have arisen, not from a denial of the power of Congress, when exercised, but... | |
 | 1915 - 1218 pages
...Chief Justice Fuller, delivering the opinion, said: "No reason is perceived why, if Congress chooses to provide that certain designated subjects of interstate...the case, it is not within its competency to do so." And in Leisy v. Hardin, the court, in referring to the case of Bowman v. Railway, 125 US 507, 8 Sup.... | |
 | 1915 - 990 pages
...perceived why, if Congress chooses to provide that goods manufactured by the labor of children for interstate commerce shall be governed by a rule which divests them of that character — ie, prevents them from becoming subjects of interstate commerce — it is not competent to do so."... | |
 | Mississippi. Supreme Court - 1916 - 1030 pages
...were imported ; and the court further stated that: "No reason is perceived why, if Congress chooses to provide that certain designated subjects of interstate...case, it is not within its competency to do so." The only difficulty that arises in this connection is that in Rhodes v. State of Iowa, supra, the court,... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Labor - 1916 - 12 pages
...US, 545), wherein Chief Justice Fuller declared: No reason is perceived why, if Congress chooses to provide that certain designated subjects of interstate...the case, it is not within its competency to do so. And again the same court affirmed: It has been settled that the effect of the act of Congress is to... | |
 | United States - 1918 - 1192 pages
...property. * '* * No reason is perceived why, if Congress chooses to proCONSTITUTION [ART. I, SEC. 8 vide that certain designated subjects of interstate commerce...the case, it is not within its competency to do so." See also Laughter v. M'Lain, (1916) 229 Fed. 280; Evansville Brewing Assoc. t-. Excise Com'rs, (1915)... | |
 | 1918 - 1290 pages
...'•»ere imported; and the court further stated that "no reason is perceived why, if Con.Ti'-a chooses to provide that certain designated subjects of interstate commerce shall be governed by a rule which dcvests them of that character at an earlier period of time than would otherwise be the case, it is... | |
| |
