 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Antitrust, Monopolies, and Business Rights - 1989 - 358 pages
...argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law, and that it is not interposed for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to...or needless increase in the cost of litigation... If a pleading, motion, or other paper is signed in violation of this rule, the Court, upon motion or... | |
 | Astrid Stadler - 1989 - 454 pages
...good faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law; (2) not interposed for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to...delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation; and (3) not unreasonable or unduly burdensome or expensive, given the needs of the case, the discovery... | |
 | Jed S. Rakoff, Howard W. Goldstein - 2023 - 784 pages
...argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law and that it is not interposed for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to...unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation.1 A court reviewing a signer's conduct in light of Rule 11 is to resolve doubts in favor... | |
 | Daniel A. Bronstein - 1990 - 174 pages
...good faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law; (2) not interposed for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to...delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation; and (3) not unreasonable or unduly burdensome or expensive, given the needs of the case, the discovery... | |
 | 1994 - 980 pages
...shall state that counsel's address and telephone number. A party who acts as his or her own counsel sign his or her individual name and state his or her...strike the filing or submission of record, unless it ia signed promptly after the omission is called to the attention of the pleader or movmt. (c) Effect... | |
 | Michael Dennis Scott - 1991 - 1014 pages
...argument for the extension, modification, or reversal or existing law, and that it is not interposed for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to...delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation. Fed. R. Civ. P., Rule 11. 1178. Hudson's Bay Co. v. Seattle Fur Exch., Inc., 2 Computer Cases (CCHl... | |
 | Herbert Hill, James Edward Jones (Jr.) - 1993 - 484 pages
...argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law, and that it is not interposed for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to...delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation. If a pleading, motion or other paper is not signed, it shall be stricken unless it is signed promptly... | |
 | 1993 - 160 pages
...good faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law; (B) not interposed for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to...delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation; and (C) not unreasonable or unduly burdensome or expensive, given the needs of the case, the discovery... | |
| |
... to the best of the signer's knowledge, information, and belief formed after reasonable inquiry it is well grounded in fact and is warranted by existing law or a good faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law, and... 
