| United States. Department of the Army - 1962 - 576 pages
...accordingly dismissed the complaint. On appeal the Circuit Court of Appeals reversed. 130 F. 2d 93. The case is here on a petition for a writ of certiorari which we granted because of the importance of the problems raised and the conflict between the decision below and SecurityFirst... | |
| United States. Federal Trade Commission - 1961 - 1140 pages
...misbranding through omission of the three categories as to which no violations were found. 254 F. 2d 18. The case is here on a petition for a writ of certiorari. 358 US 812. I First, as to invoicing. We start with an Act whose avowed purpose, inter alia, was to... | |
| United States, United States. Congress. House. Committee on Veterans' Affairs - 1961 - 216 pages
...So.2d 155, on the authority of its earlier decision in DeLoach v. Calihan, 158 Fla. 639, 30 So.2d 910. The case is here on a petition for a writ of certiorari which we granted because the construction given to the federal Act seemed to us not only a dubious one but also at variance... | |
| United States. Department of the Treasury - 1946 - 288 pages
...protest. 79 Treas. Dec., No. 7, 14. The Court of Customs and Patent Appeals reversed. 143 F. 2d 132. The case is here on a petition for a writ of certiorari which we granted because of the importance of the questions presented. The "free" rate and the "official" rate have... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1972 - 734 pages
...imprisonment. 283 F. Snpp. 945. His conviction was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. 406 F. 2d 494. The case is here on a petition for a writ of certiorari. 394 US 997. I Among the defenses tendered at the trial was the legality of the delinquency regulations... | |
| James O. Mahoy - 1975 - 912 pages
...accordingly dismissed the complaint. On appeal the Circuit Court of Appeals reversed. 130 F. 2d 93. The case is here on a petition for a writ of certiorari which we granted because of the importance of the problems raised and the conflict between the decision below and Security-First... | |
| |