| H. Lauterpacht - 1986 - 688 pages
...within the limits of its rights. In the case of the Schooner Exchange v. McFaddon et AL, 7 Cranch, no, 136, 144, the court said : ' The jurisdiction of the...amenable to the jurisdiction of the country.' " In Cunará Steamship Company, Ltd., et Al. v. Mellon, 262 US loo, 124, the court said : ' A merchant ship... | |
| United States - 1945 - 712 pages
...mingling indiscriminately with the Inhabitant* of that other, or when merchant vessels enter for th* purposes of trade, It would be obviously Inconvenient...would subject the laws to continual Infraction, and th* government to degradation, If auoh Individuals or merchants did not owe temporary and looal alleglenoe,... | |
| United States. Department of State - 1941 - 1124 pages
...as business or caprice may direct, mingling indiscriminately with the inhabitants of that other, or when merchant vessels enter for the purposes of trade,...were not amenable to the jurisdiction of the country. Nor can the foreign sovereign have any motive for wishing such exemption. His subjects thus passing... | |
| United States. Department of State - 1888 - 1230 pages
...agreement ; for, as was said by Chief-Justice Marshall in The Exchange, 7 Cranch, 144, it would bo obviously inconvenient and dangerous to society, and...infraction, and the Government to degradation, if such • • • merchants did not owe temporary and local allegiance, and were not amenable to the jurisdiction... | |
| United States - 1949 - 2362 pages
[ Sorry, this page's content is restricted ] | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs - 1955 - 1198 pages
...as business or caprice may direct, mingling indiscriminately with the inhabitants of that other, or when merchant vessels enter for the purposes of trade,...were not amenable to the jurisdiction of the country. Nor can the foreign sovereign have any motive for wishing such exemption. His subjects thus passing... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs - 1955 - 474 pages
...as business or caprice may direct, mingling indiscriminately with the inhabitants of that other, or when merchant vessels enter for the purposes of trade,...were not amenable to the jurisdiction of the country. Nor can the foreign sovereign have any motive for wishing such exemption. His subjects thus passing... | |
| |