| Ohio. Supreme Court - 1896 - 760 pages
...* * * But where the second action between the same parties is upon a different claim or demand, the judgment in the prior action operates as an estoppel...determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered." Nor is it material in this respect that one of the actions may be ex contractu, while the other sounds... | |
| Patent Office Society (U.S.) - 1924 - 658 pages
...of action the judgment in the prior action operates by way of estoppel (herein called res judicata] only as to those matters in issue or points controverted...determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered. Southern Pacific Railroad Company v. United States, 168 US 1, 50 (1897). This distinction was followed... | |
| 1926 - 1032 pages
...the same parties is upon a different claim or demand, the judgment in the prior action operates »8 an estoppel only as to those matters in issue or points...determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered. 5. Judgment ф=>584 — To constitute res judicata there must be Identity of object of suit, of causes... | |
| United States. Tax Court - 1995 - 836 pages
...preclusion "where the second action between the same parties is upon a different claim or demand, the judgment in the prior action operates as an estoppel only as to those matters in issue or (221) (236) points controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered."... | |
| Peter R. Barnett - 2001 - 432 pages
...of Sac:163 Where the second action belween the same parties is upon a different claim or demand, the judgment in the prior action operates as an estoppel...controverted, upon the determination of which the finding was rendered .... Only upon such matters is the judgment conclusive in another action, [emphasis added]... | |
| |