| Richard J. Heafey, Don M. Kennedy - 2016 - 906 pages
...substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time,...or needless presentation of cumulative evidence." See also, Marsee v. US Tobacco Co., 866 F.2d 319, 321-322 (10th Cir. 1989) (video deposition of severely... | |
| 1995 - 494 pages
...the inspection and taking the copies and photographs. {964.10 Evidence. (a) In general, admlssibility will hinge on relevancy and materiality. However,...shall be given under oath or affirmation and witnesses shall be subject to cross-examination. (c) Agreed statements of fact are encouraged and may be received... | |
| Michael S. Wogalter, Dave DeJoy, Kenneth R. Laughery - 1999 - 365 pages
...substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence. From the rules, the role of the expert is to educate the judge and/or jury (the trier of fact) with... | |
| Daniel A. Bronstein - 2010 - 248 pages
...substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence. Rule 406. Habit; Routine Practice Evidence of the habit of a person or of the routine practice of an... | |
| Helen Stacy, Michael Lavarch - 1999 - 196 pages
...probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time or needless presentation of cumulative evidence. Generally speaking, judges should ensure that appropriate costs orders should always be made when adversarial... | |
| Carl Meyer - 1998 - 260 pages
...substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence. FRE 403 The recent rule that the judge should expand the Daubert inquiry and determine whether expert... | |
| Jerome G. Snider, Howard A. Ellins, Michael S. Flynn - 2023 - 870 pages
...substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence. Rule 407. Subsequent Remedial Measures If, after an event, measures are taken that, if taken previously,... | |
| Peggy N. Kerley, Joanne Banker Hames, Paul Sukys - 2001 - 498 pages
...substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time,...or needless presentation of cumulative evidence." The court determines whether the negative aspects of the evidence outweigh its probative value. Rules... | |
| Patrick J. Sullivan, Franklin J. Agardy, Richard K. Traub - 2001 - 611 pages
...substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time,...or needless presentation of cumulative evidence." In that regard, the Daubert Court noted that "[e]xpert evidence can be both powerful and quite misleading... | |
| Eileen Barker, Université Laval. Groupe de recherches en sciences de la religion - 2001 - 264 pages
...substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence. 58 . Matthew 19:18,19 (Jerusalem Bible): He said: "Which?" "These": Jesus replied, "You must not kill.... | |
| |